Distributed RabbitMQ


AMQP 0-9-1, AMQP 1.0 and the other messaging protocols supported by RabbitMQ via plug-ins (e.g. STOMP), are (of course) inherently distributed: applications almost always connect to RabbitMQ on a remote host.

Often it is necessary or desirable to make the RabbitMQ broker itself distributed. There are three ways in which to accomplish that: with clustering, with Federation, and using the Shovel plugin. This page provides an overview of each approach.

Note that all three approaches are not mutually exclusive and can be combined: clusters can be connected together with Federation or Shovel, or both.


Clustering connects multiple machines together to form a cluster. Inter-node communication is performed transparently to clients. The design of clustering assumes that network connections are reasonably reliable and provides a LAN-like latency.

All nodes in the cluster must run compatible versions of RabbitMQ and Erlang.

Nodes authenticate to each other using a pre-shared secret typically installed by deployment automation tools.

Virtual hosts, exchanges, users, and permissions are automatically replicated across all nodes in a cluster. Queues may be located on a single node, or replicate their content for higher availability. Quorum queues is a modern replicated queue type that focuses on data safety. Classic queues can optionally be mirrored.

A client connecting to any node in a cluster can use all non-exclusive queues in the cluster, even if they are not located on that node.

Clustering nodes can help improve availability, data safety of queue contents and sustain more concurrent client connections. The Clustering, Quorum Queues and Classic Mirrored Queues guides provide more details on these topics.


Federation allows an exchange or queue on one broker to receive messages published to an exchange or queue on another (the brokers may be individual machines, or clusters). Communication is via AMQP (with optional SSL), so for two exchanges or queues to federate they must be granted appropriate users and permissions.

Federated exchanges are connected with one way point-to-point links. By default, messages will only be forwarded over a federation link once, but this can be increased to allow for more complex routing topologies. Some messages may not be forwarded over the link; if a message would not be routed to a queue after reaching the federated exchange, it will not be forwarded in the first place.

Federated queues are similarly connected with one way point-to-point links. Messages will be moved between federated queues an arbitrary number of times to follow the consumers.

Typically you would use federation to link brokers across the internet for pub/sub messaging and work queueing.


Connecting brokers with the Shovel plugin is conceptually similar to connecting them with Federation. However, the plugin works at a lower level.

Whereas federation aims to provide opinionated distribution of exchanges and queues, the shovel simply consumes messages from a queue on one broker, and forwards them to an exchange on another.

Typically you would use the shovel to link brokers across the internet when you need more control than federation provides.

Dynamic shovels can also be useful for moving messages around in an ad-hoc manner on a single broker.


Federation and/or Shovel Clustering
Brokers are logically separate and may have different owners. A cluster forms a single logical broker.
Brokers can run different (and incompatible in certain ways) versions of RabbitMQ and Erlang. Nodes must run compatible versions RabbitMQ and Erlang.
Brokers can be connected via unreliable WAN links. Communication is via AMQP 0-9-1 (optionally secured by TLS, requiring appropriate users and permissions to be set up. Brokers must be connected via reasonably reliable LAN links. Nodes will authenticate to each other using a shared secret and optionally use TLS-enabled links.
Brokers can be connected in whatever topology you arrange. Links can be one- or two-way. All nodes connect to all other nodes in both directions.
Emphasizes Availability and Partition Tolerance (AP) from the CAP theorem. Emphasizes Consistency and Partition Tolerance (CP) from the CAP theorem.
Some exchanges in a broker may be federated while some may be local. Clustering is all-or-nothing.
A client connecting to any broker can only use non-exclusive queues in that broker. A client connecting to any node can use non-exclusive queues on all nodes.

Getting Help and Providing Feedback

If you have questions about the contents of this guide or any other topic related to RabbitMQ, don't hesitate to ask them on the RabbitMQ mailing list.

Help Us Improve the Docs <3

If you'd like to contribute an improvement to the site, its source is available on GitHub. Simply fork the repository and submit a pull request. Thank you!