<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Growing Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messaging Protocols &#8211; feed a middleware monitoring solution - Programmers Goodies</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-13129</link>
		<dc:creator>Messaging Protocols &#8211; feed a middleware monitoring solution - Programmers Goodies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-13129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is that? Is AMQP that far away from production ready? From a glance RabbitMQ 2.0 (or even ØMQ) seem to have solved most problems still standing from the Reddit May 10&#8242; test. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is that? Is AMQP that far away from production ready? From a glance RabbitMQ 2.0 (or even ØMQ) seem to have solved most problems still standing from the Reddit May 10&#8242; test. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-1672</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-1672</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Chris&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The interface is that given in the behaviour src/rabbit_backing_queue.erl.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris</p>
<p>The interface is that given in the behaviour src/rabbit_backing_queue.erl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stoyles</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stoyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the &quot;Storage API&quot;: if queues were stored in PostgreSQL would this provide persistent queues across multiple machines in a cluster (e.g. if a server goes down, all it&#039;s queue items are still visible to all other members in the cluster).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If there&#039;s any documentation you can point me to that would be great, even if it&#039;s inside actual source files and I have to go digging through to find out how to use it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks,
Chris.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the "Storage API": if queues were stored in PostgreSQL would this provide persistent queues across multiple machines in a cluster (e.g. if a server goes down, all it's queue items are still visible to all other members in the cluster).</p>
<p>If there's any documentation you can point me to that would be great, even if it's inside actual source files and I have to go digging through to find out how to use it.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 06:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Kshitiz, for a full answer, you could ask on rabbitmq-discuss.  Let&#039;s say you have N consumers.  You can do this by putting all messages onto a single queue and sharing that among your N consumers.  Or, you can use N queues - one per consumer.  It is hard to comment on which will perform best without knowing more about your use case.  But, both will perform well if you don&#039;t overload the system.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kshitiz, for a full answer, you could ask on rabbitmq-discuss.  Let's say you have N consumers.  You can do this by putting all messages onto a single queue and sharing that among your N consumers.  Or, you can use N queues - one per consumer.  It is hard to comment on which will perform best without knowing more about your use case.  But, both will perform well if you don't overload the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kshitiz</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Kshitiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With RabbitMQ, I have to achieve is a faster consumption of each message. The scenario is like this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have to send emails/SMSes to different people after consuming the messages internally. I want to just post a message and consume it faster by having multiple consumers ready. The message should be consumed only by one consumer...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Should I make a no. of consumers using a shared rabbitmq queue in which each consumer consumes the message posted on the exchange, deletes it from the queue and then after passes that message to a new thread for processing ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But having a single queue might hamper the performance. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is there any other way which can cater my requirement ? what do you suggest?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>With RabbitMQ, I have to achieve is a faster consumption of each message. The scenario is like this:</p>
<p>I have to send emails/SMSes to different people after consuming the messages internally. I want to just post a message and consume it faster by having multiple consumers ready. The message should be consumed only by one consumer...</p>
<p>Should I make a no. of consumers using a shared rabbitmq queue in which each consumer consumes the message posted on the exchange, deletes it from the queue and then after passes that message to a new thread for processing ?</p>
<p>But having a single queue might hamper the performance. </p>
<p>Is there any other way which can cater my requirement ? what do you suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SysAdmin.CykloDev &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Piwik 1.0, Inkscape 0.48 et RabbitMQ 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>SysAdmin.CykloDev &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Piwik 1.0, Inkscape 0.48 et RabbitMQ 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-240</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] LinuxFr.org sur Piwik lien 3 : Inkscape 0.48 lien 4 : Insckape 0.47 sur LinuxFr.org lien 5 : RabbitMQ 2.0 lien 6 : Dépêche LinuxFr.org sur [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LinuxFr.org sur Piwik lien 3 : Inkscape 0.48 lien 4 : Insckape 0.47 sur LinuxFr.org lien 5 : RabbitMQ 2.0 lien 6 : Dépêche LinuxFr.org sur [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introducing RabbitMQ 2.0 &#124; SpringSource Team Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Introducing RabbitMQ 2.0 &#124; SpringSource Team Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] 27th, 2010 by arichardson in Spring.  If you would like to read about RabbitMQ 2.0 please check out this blog post on the RabbitMQ site.  I&#039;ll be back here next week to talk about what this means for cloud [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 27th, 2010 by arichardson in Spring.  If you would like to read about RabbitMQ 2.0 please check out this blog post on the RabbitMQ site.  I&#39;ll be back here next week to talk about what this means for cloud [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/27/growing-up/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=24#comment-161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Trackbacks...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Trackbacks...</strong></p>
<p>...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

