<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RabbitMQ and AMQP 0-9-1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kshitiz</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>Kshitiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=3#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With RabbitMQ, I have to achieve is a faster consumption of each message. The scenario is like this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have to send emails/SMSes to different people after consuming the messages internally. I want to just post a message and consume it faster by having multiple consumers ready. The message should be consumed only by one consumer…&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Should I make a no. of consumers using a shared rabbitmq queue in which each consumer consumes the message posted on the exchange, deletes it from the queue and then after passes that message to a new thread for processing ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But having a single queue might hamper the performance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is there any other way which can cater my requirement ? what do you suggest?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>With RabbitMQ, I have to achieve is a faster consumption of each message. The scenario is like this:</p>
<p>I have to send emails/SMSes to different people after consuming the messages internally. I want to just post a message and consume it faster by having multiple consumers ready. The message should be consumed only by one consumer…</p>
<p>Should I make a no. of consumers using a shared rabbitmq queue in which each consumer consumes the message posted on the exchange, deletes it from the queue and then after passes that message to a new thread for processing ?</p>
<p>But having a single queue might hamper the performance.</p>
<p>Is there any other way which can cater my requirement ? what do you suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek P. Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek P. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=3#comment-193</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please make the Java Client backwards compatible to 0-8.  The Java Client internals have support for multiple protocols, it&#039;s only a matter of using them and/or exposing them through the ConnectionFactory.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please make the Java Client backwards compatible to 0-8.  The Java Client internals have support for multiple protocols, it's only a matter of using them and/or exposing them through the ConnectionFactory.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RabbitMQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Growing Up - Messaging that just works</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>RabbitMQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Growing Up - Messaging that just works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=3#comment-159</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Native support for multi-protocol messaging delivering better interoperability and more [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Native support for multi-protocol messaging delivering better interoperability and more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon MacMullen</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon MacMullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=3#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AMQP is backwards compatible in the sense that client and server negotiate a version of the protocol to use. The situation is not hugely different from HTTP in that regard.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMQP is backwards compatible in the sense that client and server negotiate a version of the protocol to use. The situation is not hugely different from HTTP in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Garrison</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>William Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=3#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps this is a stupid question but why is AMQP not backwards compatible like any other modern protocol?  Surely this is easy to do with optional headers and feature negotiation.  This is how websockets works.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this is a stupid question but why is AMQP not backwards compatible like any other modern protocol?  Surely this is easy to do with optional headers and feature negotiation.  This is how websockets works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for RabbitMQ » Blog Archive » RabbitMQ and AMQP 0-9-1 - Messaging that just works [rabbitmq.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for RabbitMQ » Blog Archive » RabbitMQ and AMQP 0-9-1 - Messaging that just works [rabbitmq.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabbitmq.com/blog/?p=3#comment-9</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] RabbitMQ » Blog Archive » RabbitMQ and AMQP 0-9-1 - Messaging that just works  rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/ &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  RabbitMQ is a complete and highly reliable enterprise messaging system based on the emerging AMQP standard    Tweets about this link [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RabbitMQ » Blog Archive » RabbitMQ and AMQP 0-9-1 - Messaging that just works  rabbitmq.com/blog/2010/08/04/rabbitmq-and-amqp-0-9-1/ &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  RabbitMQ is a complete and highly reliable enterprise messaging system based on the emerging AMQP standard    Tweets about this link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

